Category Archives: Strategy

Self-Review

Stay tuned for a future Doctor Jones post on the influential book Getting Things Done, but in the meantime, I wanted to lend my support to one of the book’s tenets.

Periodic review of one’s work is one of the best ways to spur productivity. It can seem counter-intuitive. Let’s say you’ve had a bad, ineffective week of work. Instead of sitting down on Friday afternoon to assess your progress, you want to actually get something done.

But parodoxically, the very act of reviewing makes one more productive. I think this is one of the biggest benefits of having a Dissertation Support Group. Simply preparing for that meeting for fifteen minutes–which for me, involves checking the progress of last week’s goals, setting new goals for the following week, and noting a “big idea” that I had over the course of the week–often helps me crystalize some aspect of my project. Knowing that the check-in is imminent also sometimes prompts me to quickly finish (or start) working on one of my previous goals–even though there are no negative consequences if I don’t work on them.

I recommend periodic check-ins, alone or in groups. They are not a waste of time.

Writing in a Vacuum

Gerald Graff wrote a really interesting column in the MLA newsletter this month, which pointed out that many undergraduate papers are asked to interpret a text in a vacuum.

I know that’s true of my undergraduate experience. Most of the time, I was specifically told not to cite criticism in my papers. No wonder I am struggling to “enter the conversation” to this day. For much of my academic career, no professor explained to me the importance of answering the “so what?” question or finding someone who disagreed with me.

I bring this up for two reasons: first, making students enter a conversation when they write any paper, in any class, is a compelling idea. Second, as Graff points out, in many academic genres (the conference talk, the job application, the dissertation abstract), it is vitally important to explain both why your project matters and why it may be controversial.

Committee Choices

Today I had a really good meeting with a member of my committee, and so I’ve been thinking again about the importance of choosing one’s committee wisely.

The best thing about this professor is that by the end of our meetings, I feel full of ideas and excitement. I don’t feel this way only because she gives good advice (which she does), but also because she is very engaged with my ideas. It’s such a great feeling to know that I have her full attention.

I was thinking about another person who many people have said was an “obvious” choice to be on my committee. I chose not to ask them, and here’s why: this person had read my first messy attempt at doing what I do in my dissertation. They were critical of it, but it wasn’t the criticism that was the problem. They just didn’t get what I was trying to do, or if they did, they didn’t care about the issues I was wrestling with.  I felt conflicted at first about not asking them to be on my committee, but once I found the right people it became very obvious I had made the right decision.

Other qualities I like in a committee member:

  • I like someone I can meet socially and have a pleasant, non-academic conversation with.
  • I like someone who can give practical advice about the writing process and about university bureaucracy.
  • I like someone who has advice about how to deal with other committee members–not necessarily a gossip, just someone who will speak from a professor’s point of view about how they like the committee member / student relationship to work.
  • I like someone who listens carefully to what I say and responds thoughtfully.
  • I like someone who makes me feel welcome to contact them frequently. It’s very hard to show someone your work if you feel you are imposing on them.

Interviews

I recently attended a panel on interviewing at my school. I want to share my favorite piece of advice: the people who interview you for an academic job are looking for a good co-worker.

Some ways to foster the impression that you will be pleasant to work with:

  1. Show genuine interest in the interviewers when appropriate (during pre- or post-interview chit chat, not in the middle of the interview).
  2. Speak concisely about your project and avoid overly specific jargon. Being long-winded and unclear is unpopular in every profession–yes, even academia.
  3. If you get a strange question (from your future socially awkward colleague), deal with it as gracefully as you can. Don’t make the interviewer feel bad by dismissing the question, but don’t be rattled either–likely the other interviewers are feeling embarrassed by the situation, too.
  4. Be yourself. Give good chemistry a chance to develop.
  5. Never, ever, say anything bad about any of your current or past colleagues. Even if you are a gossip, don’t let on!

Research / Archive

One of the more effective strategies I have for researching is the “Books I’ve Read” folder in my computer. All of the books and articles I’ve read for my dissertation have their own file. The files themselves are not identical in format. They reflect different strategies I’ve had in researching–summarizing the book, a free-write in response to reading it, or simply a long list of quotations.

Before I started writing my dissertation, I would sometimes wonder if getting all those notes organized into computer files was a waste of time.

I think I did waste some time by taking notes by hand and then re-typing them into the computer. This also resulted in double-guilt when I wasn’t working well: I had to read AND I had to re-type and regurgitate the contents of the book, and if I wasn’t doing both of those things regularly I felt bad about myself. If I had to do it again, I would take notes straight into the computer file and not worry about formatting those notes in any particular way. (If you ever read something and have a rush of ideas afterward, by all means write them down. If a book leaves you cold, though, it’s okay to move on with a minimum of reflection.)

Now, as I’m writing the dissertation, I find my extensive archive of quotes from my research sources incredibly helpful. While writing each of my chapters, I read back over all of the notes in the “Books I Read” file. I am often surprised by the provoking and / or inspiring books I’ve completely forgotten about.

Some of the files are only a few lines long, and some are a dozen pages. But all of them help me to access the ideas that have shaped my project.

Networking

A lot of young professionals, myself included, really dislike networking. I think the reason many of us dislike it is because we believe that networking is synonymous with manipulation and scheming.

I just read a magazine article in The Writer by Susan Johnston called “Tips for No-Pain Networking.” The most important point that she made is that networking is about mutual gain. If, while at a conference, you’re cruising the crowd for someone who can advance your career, you’re bound to feel awkward and gross.

Rather than focusing on your own goals when meeting new people, look for ways in which you can help them. Point the way to the bathroom, or offer a bit of gentle feedback on a presentation (“I thought the most interesting thing you said was . . .”). Offer to e-mail someone the name of a book that might be relevant to her project.

Sure, you may secretly hope that your good deeds will be noticed and reciprocated. But you aren’t breaking any networking rules if your interest in other people is genuine.

Inadequacy

I recently attended a professionalization workshop and someone did my least favorite thing: they told us graduate students that we should “start last week” on completing a major project.

Sometimes our colleagues seems to use feelings of inadequacy as a crutch–limping toward productive work as they’re chased by demons of what should be done.

The Future Dr. Anderson mentioned this to the Future Dr. Gale (who just defended her dissertation!) about a month ago. She said that people seem to feel that it is expected to freak out and hem and haw about what they should be doing to prepare for a dissertation defense. But isn’t is possible that what one feels like doing while waiting for the defense (nothing) is actually good preparation? Here the Future Dr. Gale was with a near 300-page dissertation, feeling that she actually needed to be packing more potential sources into her head on the off-chance that someone would bring one of them up. (And if memory serves, the Future Dr. Gale got exactly zero questions about literary criticism outside of her own.)

There should be moments in our career where we feel accomplished, on top of things, like we are doing exactly what we should be doing.

Finding Your Argument

After I handed him very messy, fifty-page draft of a chapter that I had “no idea” what to do with, Prof. Cole Hutchison suggested I re-write the draft with no quoting. That way, I would avoid relying too heavily on quotes (a major weakness of the first draft) and would state a unique argument.

I didn’t take that advice at the time, but a few weeks ago, as I began Chapter 2, I set out to write a twenty-page chapter with almost no evidence.

I skipped around, writing wherever inspiration struck. And I wrote in relatively short spurts, simply trying to add a little each day.

One of the longest sections in my 18-page draft is the conclusion. There, I lay out all the main points I covered in the chapter. Of course, they seem a bit flimsy with no evidence to back them up. But unlike my first draft of Chapter 1, Chapter 2 is not a complete mess of tangents. It is compact. It is full of ideas.

The next time I dig through my notes, I will be digging with purpose. I know what I want to say–what I am saying.

Beware the E-mail

For creative work, says this month’s issue of Poets and Writers, it’s important to avoid distractions like e-mail.  This is because we actually think better if there is less stuff in our brain.  Billy Collins supports this idea when he claims that boredom is his best inspiration for writing poems.  Since we can’t stare at the ocean every day before working on our dissertations, at the very least we can keep our information gathering contained.  I am personally terrible at this–I probably check my e-mail five or six times a day.  But I only answer e-mails every few days, which means I’ve got stuff in my brain rattling around needlessly.

If e-mail is a treat for you, check it at the end of your work day.  But if you’re like me and open your inbox when you’re bored, it’s probably time to give it a rest.  Boredom could be your ticket to a new insight on your work.

It’s a Human Thing

Ever wonder why you don’t have self-control?